00:00 - 00:04
it's November 2024 and I bought every
00:02 - 00:06
projector on Amazon priced less than
00:04 - 00:08
$100 so we can sift through the
00:06 - 00:10
marketing and occasional Flatout lies on
00:08 - 00:12
their listings and unfortunately for the
00:10 - 00:14
most part you guys are buying the wrong
00:12 - 00:16
stuff but it's really not your fault in
00:14 - 00:19
this video we're going to actually test
00:16 - 00:21
their brightness contrast fan noise
00:19 - 00:23
focus and resolution we're going to put
00:21 - 00:25
them side by side in a picture quality
00:23 - 00:27
test and last I'll do some more in-depth
00:25 - 00:29
input lag and speaker quality testing of
00:27 - 00:30
the best ones to figure out which
00:29 - 00:33
projectors are worth your money and
00:30 - 00:34
which ones are mostly e-w and as always
00:33 - 00:35
there are no sponsored reviews on this
00:34 - 00:37
channel and I bought all these
00:35 - 00:39
projectors with my own money starting
00:37 - 00:40
out with brightness testing it's still
00:39 - 00:42
pretty common for these projectors to
00:40 - 00:45
list ridiculous brightness numbers like
00:42 - 00:46
15,000 lumens and while that's
00:45 - 00:48
technically not a lie it's just the
00:46 - 00:50
brightness of the actual LED light
00:48 - 00:52
source inside of the projector and it
00:50 - 00:54
isn't anywhere close to the amount of
00:52 - 00:56
light that reaches the screen I tested
00:54 - 00:58
each of these 25 projectors using the an
00:56 - 01:00
standard where you take nine individual
00:58 - 01:01
brightness readings and multiply the
01:00 - 01:03
average brightness by the screen si in
01:01 - 01:05
square meters to get the number of an
01:03 - 01:08
lumens and unsurprisingly none of the
01:05 - 01:09
projectors had 15,000 lumens but the
01:08 - 01:12
brightest projector by a pretty
01:09 - 01:17
significant margin was The $99 Gro VI JQ
01:12 - 01:18
818c measuring 492 an lumens and then a
01:17 - 01:21
big chunk of these projectors were
01:18 - 01:22
around 200 an lumens and unfortunately
01:21 - 01:25
three of the most purchased cheap
01:22 - 01:27
projectors on Amazon were under 100 an
01:25 - 01:29
lumens I also measured their contrast by
01:27 - 01:31
dividing the brightness of a pure white
01:29 - 01:34
screen by the brightness of a pure black
01:31 - 01:37
screen and I found out that the $99 onoo
01:34 - 01:40
ay2 Pro came out on top with a very
01:37 - 01:42
impressive 4,500 to1 contrast ratio but
01:40 - 01:43
overall the contrast of most of these
01:42 - 01:46
projectors is very good and the large
01:43 - 01:47
majority were over 2,000 to1 which is
01:46 - 01:49
extremely competitive even with much
01:47 - 01:51
more expensive projectors however one
01:49 - 01:52
area that these cheap projectors
01:51 - 01:54
struggle in is brightness uniformity
01:52 - 01:56
where the center of the image is
01:54 - 01:58
significantly brighter than one or all
01:56 - 02:02
of the corners and unsurprisingly the
01:58 - 02:04
second dimmest projector the $9 igr had
02:02 - 02:06
the highest uniformity at
02:04 - 02:09
72.7% but amazingly the brightest
02:06 - 02:11
projector the gro JQ 818c had the second
02:11 - 02:14
69.9% another issue that these cheap
02:13 - 02:16
projectors struggle with compared to
02:14 - 02:19
more expensive ones is fan noise since
02:16 - 02:21
projecting a 15,000 Lumen light source
02:19 - 02:24
through an LCD screen that absorbs 97%
02:21 - 02:25
of that light generates a lot of heat
02:24 - 02:27
and I measured each projector's fan
02:25 - 02:30
noise from a distance of 12 in and I
02:27 - 02:35
found that the quietest was the $89 onoo
02:30 - 02:35
ay3 with a fan noise of 39.9
02:35 - 02:42
D but some other notably decent
02:38 - 02:44
performers were the voal N3 onoo ay2 Pro
02:42 - 02:46
and The Haun H1 which had high Lumin but
02:44 - 02:49
low fan noise and the loudest projector
02:46 - 02:50
by far was the extremely popular Hy 320
02:49 - 02:55
that's all over the Tik Tok store and
02:50 - 02:55
that came out at an overwhelming 51.6
02:55 - 03:00
DB next I tested their throw ratio which
02:58 - 03:01
is the distance required for for your
03:00 - 03:04
projector to produce a certain size of
03:01 - 03:06
screen and here are the throw distances
03:04 - 03:07
for a 100in screen with some notable
03:06 - 03:10
measurements being the ha run and the
03:07 - 03:13
grow view that needed between 125 and
03:10 - 03:15
135 in for a 100 in screen which is
03:13 - 03:17
longer than most projectors and on the
03:15 - 03:20
other end of the spectrum the small Hy
03:17 - 03:22
300 only needs 79 in to produce a 100in
03:20 - 03:25
screen which technically classifies it
03:22 - 03:26
as a short throw projector another place
03:25 - 03:28
where these companies try to trick you
03:26 - 03:30
on their listings is by putting things
03:28 - 03:32
like 1080P or 4K supported in their
03:30 - 03:34
titles and all that means is that you
03:32 - 03:36
can feed them 1080P or 4K content but it
03:34 - 03:37
doesn't necessarily mean that they could
03:36 - 03:40
display that resolution which would be
03:37 - 03:41
called their native resolution usually a
03:40 - 03:43
quick search of the listing will show
03:41 - 03:45
you the true native resolution but I
03:43 - 03:46
have suspicions that even some of those
03:45 - 03:48
numbers can't be trusted since this
03:46 - 03:51
extremely popular projector from pensaba
03:48 - 03:53
that sold 6,000 units last month claims
03:51 - 03:54
to be 1080p but in the side-by-side
03:53 - 03:56
testing you can see that it doesn't
03:54 - 03:58
properly display 1080p content and it
03:56 - 03:59
squishes the entire image vertically
03:58 - 04:01
which is usually a sign that it's not
03:59 - 04:03
using its native resolution along with
04:01 - 04:05
resolution I tested their focus quality
04:03 - 04:07
when lined up perfectly with the screen
04:05 - 04:09
I started out by projecting this image
04:07 - 04:11
and focusing the center perfectly then I
04:09 - 04:13
inspected the text in all four corners
04:11 - 04:15
and I rated their quality from 1 to 10
04:13 - 04:18
and I found that the best Focus
04:15 - 04:21
uniformity was from the onoo ay3 the gru
04:18 - 04:24
JQ 818c the Dragon Touch lo2 and the
04:21 - 04:26
cange Hy 320 which are all true 1080p
04:24 - 04:28
native projectors and usually combining
04:26 - 04:29
brightness contrast and resolution
04:28 - 04:30
together will give you a good indication
04:29 - 04:32
of the the projector's overall image
04:30 - 04:34
quality but there's really only one way
04:32 - 04:37
to know for sure so I set up two
04:34 - 04:38
identical 100in screens and I put the
04:37 - 04:40
projector's head to head going from the
04:38 - 04:43
least expensive to the most and I do
04:40 - 04:44
have 25 projectors here which means 24
04:43 - 04:45
rounds so I'm going to move pretty
04:44 - 04:47
quickly through any rounds that weren't
04:45 - 04:50
necessarily close like round one that
04:47 - 04:53
had the Arta y g210 on the left and the
04:50 - 04:55
voal N3 on the right and neither of them
04:53 - 04:58
looked great but the Arta is essentially
04:55 - 05:00
garbage with 25 anti lumens and a 480p
04:58 - 05:03
native resolution so the N3 easily moved
05:00 - 05:05
on round two brings in the Pensa hio4 on
05:03 - 05:07
the left and the voal N3 on the right
05:05 - 05:09
and you can see that the Pensa actually
05:07 - 05:11
does a better job with color but as I
05:09 - 05:12
mentioned earlier it squishes the aspect
05:11 - 05:15
ratio of the video and the brightness
05:12 - 05:17
was still too low at just 76 lumens so
05:15 - 05:20
the N3 moved on again round three then
05:17 - 05:22
put the CEST w3s on the left and the
05:20 - 05:25
voal N3 on the right and similar to the
05:22 - 05:27
last round the W1 13s did a good job
05:25 - 05:29
with color but the focus was soft and
05:27 - 05:30
the brightness was low so the N3 took
05:29 - 05:33
this round also and that meant that
05:30 - 05:36
round four was the lfas bl1 128 on the
05:33 - 05:38
left and the voal N3 on the right and
05:36 - 05:40
you can tell that the bl1 128's color
05:38 - 05:42
was much better than the N3 which was
05:40 - 05:44
bright but pretty washed out in bright
05:42 - 05:46
scenes and to me it seemed like the
05:44 - 05:48
increase in color performance was worth
05:46 - 05:50
the decrease in overall brightness so
05:48 - 05:53
the BL 128 moved on and that made round
05:50 - 05:55
five the lfas BL 128 on the left and the
05:53 - 05:57
nisso M10 on the right and well it
05:55 - 06:00
wasn't quite as bad as the Arta from
05:57 - 06:02
round one the nisso was pretty terrible
06:00 - 06:04
with just 74 ansy lumens and an
06:02 - 06:05
incorrect aspect ratio that squished the
06:04 - 06:09
entire image vertically so this round
06:05 - 06:11
wasn't close round six put the lfas bl18
06:09 - 06:13
on the left and the visible v116 on the
06:11 - 06:14
right and this round was pretty close
06:13 - 06:16
with both projectors doing a decent job
06:14 - 06:18
with colors but I thought that the visel
06:16 - 06:20
looked a little bit too harsh in bright
06:18 - 06:21
scenes and in Darker scenes the lfas had
06:20 - 06:24
much brighter highlights making the
06:21 - 06:26
image look more contrasty and easier to
06:24 - 06:28
watch so the lfas moved on again round
06:26 - 06:30
seven then put the lfas b128 on the left
06:28 - 06:32
and the haon each one on the right and
06:30 - 06:33
the ha run really showed off why it's
06:32 - 06:36
been my pick for the best projector
06:33 - 06:38
under $75 for the last 2 years with nice
06:36 - 06:40
saturated colors good brightness and
06:38 - 06:42
excellent contrast easily beating the
06:40 - 06:44
lfs and moving on and that made round
06:42 - 06:46
eight the gro view B20 on the left and
06:44 - 06:48
The Haun H1 on the right and honestly
06:46 - 06:49
the B20 looked pretty good but
06:48 - 06:52
ultimately not anywhere close to as good
06:49 - 06:54
as The Haun H1 which was brighter with
06:52 - 06:56
better color and better contrast in both
06:54 - 06:58
bright scenes and in dark scenes round
06:56 - 07:00
nine put the Dragon Touch lo2 on the
06:58 - 07:02
left and The Haun H1 one on the right
07:00 - 07:04
and this round wasn't close at all and
07:02 - 07:06
the lo2 had splotchy color skewed
07:04 - 07:08
heavily towards blue and pretty bad
07:06 - 07:09
contrast with milky gray black so the
07:08 - 07:12
haon moved on again and that made round
07:09 - 07:15
10 the be jovial Hy 300 on the left and
07:12 - 07:18
the haon H1 on the right and honestly
07:15 - 07:21
for a 720p projector with 144 an lumens
07:18 - 07:23
the Hy 300 actually didn't look bad at
07:21 - 07:25
all with good color and decent contrast
07:23 - 07:26
but again it just wasn't anywhere close
07:25 - 07:29
to the quality of the ha run which moved
07:26 - 07:31
on again round 11 then put the oppco B1
07:29 - 07:33
158 on the left and The Haun H1 on the
07:31 - 07:35
right and for two projectors with pretty
07:33 - 07:36
similar stats this round was not as
07:35 - 07:39
close as it should have been with the
07:36 - 07:41
Oppo looking pretty dull and lifeless in
07:39 - 07:43
both light and dark scenes meaning the
07:41 - 07:46
ha run was going to move on again round
07:43 - 07:48
12 was then the igr v20 on the left and
07:46 - 07:51
The Haun H1 on the right and the fact
07:48 - 07:54
that a 52 Len 480p projector costs more
07:51 - 07:55
than The Haun makes you realize just how
07:54 - 07:57
impossible it is for the average
07:55 - 07:59
consumer to pick a projector and in
07:57 - 08:01
addition to poor brightness bad color
07:59 - 08:03
andow resolution the v220 also didn't
08:01 - 08:05
display the aspect ratio properly so the
08:03 - 08:07
haon moved on round 13 is past the
08:05 - 08:10
halfway point and it puts the clock wo
08:07 - 08:11
M8 on the left and the haon H1 on the
08:10 - 08:13
right and again this was not
08:11 - 08:15
particularly close and not only did the
08:13 - 08:17
M8 have poor colors and contrast but it
08:15 - 08:18
also had a bright white spot in the
08:17 - 08:20
bottom middle of the screen probably
08:18 - 08:23
from some kind of internal reflection
08:20 - 08:25
round 14 has the Hal Momo h500 on the
08:23 - 08:27
left and the ha run H1 on the right and
08:25 - 08:30
as noted previously the Hal Momo's Focus
08:27 - 08:31
uniformity is atrocious but even more
08:30 - 08:33
than that it seemed like the Hal Momo
08:31 - 08:34
was trying to do some kind of motion
08:33 - 08:36
processing which caused stuttering and
08:34 - 08:38
tearing that I've never seen on one of
08:36 - 08:39
these cheap projectors before so in
08:38 - 08:41
spite of decent resolution and
08:39 - 08:42
brightness the Hal Momo was actually one
08:41 - 08:44
of the worst performing projectors yet
08:42 - 08:47
and that made round 15 the very popular
08:44 - 08:49
magic cubic Hy 320 on the left and the
08:47 - 08:51
ha run H1 on the right and again a
08:49 - 08:53
combination of bad color and low
08:51 - 08:55
contrast made this no contest at all and
08:53 - 08:58
an easy win for the ha run without even
08:55 - 09:00
considering the fan noise of the Hy 320
08:58 - 09:02
round 16 then put the the yabber E1 on
09:00 - 09:04
the left and The Haun H1 on the right
09:02 - 09:05
and this was definitely closer but for
09:04 - 09:08
some reason the yabber E1 made
09:05 - 09:10
everyone's skin look weird and bumpy and
09:08 - 09:12
I've watched this same scene hundreds of
09:10 - 09:14
times in 4k on projectors that cost
09:12 - 09:15
thousands of dollars and I can
09:14 - 09:17
definitely tell you that it's not
09:15 - 09:20
supposed to look like that so The Haun
09:17 - 09:22
H1 moved on again round 17 put the tmy
09:20 - 09:24
SP on the left and The Haun H1 on the
09:22 - 09:26
right and again this was much closer
09:24 - 09:28
than some of the previous rounds but to
09:26 - 09:30
me the tmy was a little bit dull and
09:28 - 09:33
undersaturated ated so the ha run won
09:30 - 09:36
this round also in round 18 the pensaba
09:33 - 09:37
qk6 was on the left and The Haun H1 was
09:36 - 09:39
on the right and this was maybe the
09:37 - 09:42
closest round yet but I thought that the
09:39 - 09:44
qk6 made skin tones a little bit too
09:42 - 09:46
Orange in bright scenes and in dark
09:44 - 09:48
scenes the contrast and Gamma on the ha
09:46 - 09:49
run were just much easier to watch so I
09:48 - 09:52
also picked the ha run in this round
09:49 - 09:54
round 19 was then the celange Hy 320 on
09:52 - 09:56
the left and The Haun H1 on the right
09:54 - 09:58
and again this was a pretty close Round
09:56 - 10:00
In Bright scenes but the haun's color
09:58 - 10:02
was definitely still more accurate and
10:00 - 10:04
saturated and in Darker scenes it was no
10:02 - 10:06
contest and the Hy 320 was way too dim
10:04 - 10:07
compared to The Punchy highlights of the
10:06 - 10:09
ha run and the ha run moved on without
10:07 - 10:11
even considering the Extremely Loud fan
10:09 - 10:14
noise of the Hy 320 and that made round
10:11 - 10:16
20 the vanvo VF 320 on the left and The
10:14 - 10:18
Haun H1 on the right and in bright
10:16 - 10:20
scenes the vambo was slightly less
10:18 - 10:21
saturated than the ha run but I felt
10:20 - 10:23
like it actually led to a little bit
10:21 - 10:24
better color accuracy and I was also
10:23 - 10:27
impressed with the sharpness of the VF
10:24 - 10:29
320 which very confusingly is a 720p
10:27 - 10:31
native projector so you wouldn't expect
10:29 - 10:33
great sharpness but to me it seemed like
10:31 - 10:35
it showed more detail in faces and skin
10:33 - 10:37
without looking like the yabber did a
10:35 - 10:39
few rounds earlier and in dark scenes
10:37 - 10:40
the VF 320 had great color and great
10:39 - 10:42
highlights and I would have never
10:40 - 10:45
expected a 720p projector to take down
10:42 - 10:46
the ha run after 14 rounds but I think
10:45 - 10:49
that the vano earned the win here so
10:46 - 10:52
round 21 was the vanvo 320 on the left
10:49 - 10:54
and the onoo ay3 on the right and again
10:52 - 10:56
the vano was just so much sharper in
10:54 - 10:58
bright scenes and the a3's black levels
10:56 - 10:59
were a little bit muddy and gray so the
10:58 - 11:02
vanvo easily moved gone through this
10:59 - 11:05
round in round 22 the vanvo VF 320 was
11:02 - 11:06
on the left and the onoo ay2 pro was on
11:05 - 11:08
the right and in bright scenes they were
11:06 - 11:10
very similar with the vanvo sharpness
11:08 - 11:12
sticking out to me again but the dark
11:10 - 11:14
scene performance on the ay2 pro was the
11:12 - 11:16
best we've seen yet and it managed to
11:14 - 11:17
get great bright highlights while
11:16 - 11:21
maintaining excellent black levels due
11:17 - 11:22
to its huge 4500 to1 contrast ratio so
11:21 - 11:24
with similar performance in bright
11:22 - 11:26
scenes and dominating performance in
11:24 - 11:28
dark scenes the ay2 pro easily took this
11:26 - 11:30
round and that meant that round 23 was
11:28 - 11:33
the top tro tr23 on the left and the
11:30 - 11:35
onoo ay2 pro on the right and unlike the
11:33 - 11:37
last few rounds this one wasn't
11:35 - 11:40
particularly close and while the tr23
11:37 - 11:43
wasn't bad by any means it was just 70%
11:40 - 11:45
as bright as the ay2 pro with only 25%
11:43 - 11:47
of the contrast so it didn't really have
11:45 - 11:49
a chance and the ay2 pro moved on again
11:47 - 11:51
and that made the final round the gro
11:49 - 11:53
viw JQ 818c which just recently started
11:51 - 11:56
to regularly sell for less than $100 on
11:53 - 11:58
the left and the onoo ay2 pro on the
11:56 - 12:00
right and the Grove view is over 2 and 1
11:58 - 12:02
half times times brighter than the onoo
12:00 - 12:04
which in person makes bright scenes much
12:02 - 12:06
more vibrant though you can tell that
12:04 - 12:08
the colors weren't nearly as accurate as
12:06 - 12:09
the ay2 pro and that brightness also
12:08 - 12:11
helped scenes with medium lighting
12:09 - 12:13
appear to be higher contrast on the
12:11 - 12:15
Grove view but in the darkest scenes the
12:13 - 12:18
ay2 pro did have better black levels and
12:15 - 12:20
overall contrast and ultimately I picked
12:18 - 12:22
the gro view but if color accuracy is
12:20 - 12:23
more important to you then the ay2 pro
12:22 - 12:25
would probably be a better pick and that
12:23 - 12:27
makes this the overall ranking for
12:25 - 12:28
picture quality and from this point on
12:27 - 12:30
I'm going to narrow down my test to just
12:28 - 12:32
the top five and do a little bit of
12:30 - 12:33
additional testing starting with input
12:32 - 12:35
lag which is the delay between when the
12:33 - 12:37
video signal goes into the projector and
12:35 - 12:39
when it gets shown on the screen and in
12:37 - 12:41
general input lag numbers under 20
12:39 - 12:42
milliseconds are very good for gaming
12:41 - 12:44
between 20 and 50 milliseconds is
12:42 - 12:46
acceptable but not great and anything
12:44 - 12:48
above 100 milliseconds will not work for
12:46 - 12:51
gaming of the top five projectors the
12:48 - 12:54
vanvo had by far the best input lag
12:51 - 12:56
locked in at 19.3 millisecs for perfect
12:54 - 12:57
1080p 60 HZ gaming and that's followed
12:56 - 13:00
up by the gro View and the ha run which
12:57 - 13:02
bounced between 35 and 45 milliseconds
13:00 - 13:04
depending on the frame which as I said
13:02 - 13:07
is acceptable but not great and the onoo
13:04 - 13:09
ay2 pro bounced between 65 and 78
13:07 - 13:11
milliseconds which would start to feel a
13:09 - 13:13
little bit strange when trying to game
13:11 - 13:15
on it and the top tro tr23 was well
13:13 - 13:17
above 100 milliseconds meaning you can't
13:15 - 13:19
really use it for gaming I also tested
13:17 - 13:20
the speaker quality and volume of each
13:19 - 13:22
of the top five projectors and here they
13:20 - 13:27
are from quietest to loudest with my
13:22 - 13:27
subjective audio quality score overlaid
13:33 - 13:38
Julio good to see you you got something
13:35 - 13:41
for us from a new ally a spy in the
13:38 - 13:41
first order a
13:48 - 13:54
spy Julio good to see you you got
13:51 - 13:55
something for us from a new ally a spy
13:54 - 13:58
in the first
14:06 - 14:11
boo good to see you you got something
14:08 - 14:15
for us from a new ally a spy in the
14:11 - 14:22
first order a
14:22 - 14:28
spy Julio good to see you you got
14:25 - 14:30
something for us from a new ally a spy
14:28 - 14:39
in the first order
14:39 - 14:45
SP Julio good to see you you got
14:42 - 14:48
something for us from a new ally a spy
14:45 - 14:50
in the first order the F so it's
14:48 - 14:52
conclusion time for 2024 and
14:50 - 14:54
unfortunately I don't think that there
14:52 - 14:56
is one perfect option that ticks all the
14:54 - 14:58
boxes but I've definitely still got
14:56 - 15:00
recommendations first for the third year
14:58 - 15:03
in a row I think that the Haun H1 is the
15:00 - 15:05
best projector for most people it has
15:03 - 15:07
higher than average brightness contrast
15:05 - 15:08
sharpness and uniformity it finished
15:07 - 15:11
fourth overall in the side-by-side
15:08 - 15:13
testing it's got acceptable input lag
15:11 - 15:15
for casual gaming speakers that are loud
15:13 - 15:18
enough and of acceptable quality and
15:15 - 15:18
fans that aren't too terribly noisy or
15:19 - 15:23
distracting and maybe most importantly
15:22 - 15:26
it can often be found on sale for less
15:23 - 15:28
than $50 which makes it by far the best
15:26 - 15:30
value also just to double check hauns
15:28 - 15:32
quality control I bought a brand new H1
15:30 - 15:33
this year to compare to my one-year-old
15:32 - 15:36
model and the new one actually had
15:33 - 15:37
better brightness and contrast so I feel
15:36 - 15:39
confident that you'll get the exact same
15:37 - 15:40
performance as me and don't forget to
15:39 - 15:42
get it set up correctly using my setup
15:40 - 15:43
and calibration video If you're looking
15:42 - 15:46
for something smaller or you're focused
15:43 - 15:48
specifically on gaming the vanvo VF 320
15:46 - 15:50
is compact with good brightness contrast
15:48 - 15:52
and above average brightness uniformity
15:50 - 15:54
and it's got great input lag numbers for
15:52 - 15:56
gaming and loudspeakers that sound
15:54 - 15:58
surprisingly decent with the downsides
15:56 - 16:02
of the vanvo being a louder than normal
15:58 - 16:02
fan that clocks in at 47.3
16:03 - 16:08
DB and 720p native resolution though
16:06 - 16:10
that didn't stop it from finishing third
16:08 - 16:11
overall in picture quality if gaming
16:10 - 16:13
isn't as important to you and you just
16:11 - 16:15
want the quietest projector with good
16:13 - 16:17
picture quality the onoo ay2 pro
16:15 - 16:19
finished second overall in the side
16:17 - 16:21
by-side testing it had the highest
16:19 - 16:25
contrast of any of the projectors and it
16:21 - 16:25
has a very quiet fan at just 41.3
16:26 - 16:31
DB if you want the brightest option
16:28 - 16:33
option under $100 that is the gro VI JQ
16:31 - 16:35
818c which is over two times brighter
16:33 - 16:36
than the next brightest projector and
16:35 - 16:38
consequently finished first in the side
16:36 - 16:40
by side testing the grow view also had
16:38 - 16:41
the loudest speakers and acceptable
16:40 - 16:43
input lag numbers for gaming but all
16:41 - 16:48
that brightness comes at a cost because
16:43 - 16:48
the fan is louder than most at 48.4
16:49 - 16:54
DB and the grow view is roughly three
16:51 - 16:55
times as big and uses three times as
16:54 - 16:58
much power as the rest of the projectors
16:55 - 17:01
in the video still almost 500 anti Lumin
16:58 - 17:03
for $99 is pretty incredible and last if
17:01 - 17:05
you need a little bit of flexibility in
17:03 - 17:07
placement I also kind of admit to liking
17:05 - 17:09
the Tik Tok famous Hy 300 due almost
17:07 - 17:12
entirely to its little aiming stand and
17:09 - 17:16
short throw ratio and it also has 4o
17:12 - 17:16
Keystone and a 44.4 D
17:16 - 17:20
fan but be aware that people have
17:19 - 17:22
reported some issues with the Android
17:20 - 17:24
operating system freezing often it uses
17:22 - 17:26
a Netflix app that's designed for cell
17:24 - 17:28
phones and it has almost 200
17:26 - 17:30
milliseconds of input lag which means no
17:28 - 17:31
gaming but it is pretty neat for 50
17:30 - 17:33
bucks especially if you're just going to
17:31 - 17:34
watch YouTube as always there are no
17:33 - 17:35
sponsored reviews on this channel but I
17:34 - 17:37
do have links for all the projectors
17:35 - 17:38
down in the description and as always I
17:37 - 17:40
appreciate when you use those links
17:38 - 17:42
since as an Amazon affiliate I do earn a
17:40 - 17:43
small Commission on the sale at no cost
17:42 - 17:45
to you I'd also like to thank all of my
17:43 - 17:46
awesome patrons over at patreon for
17:45 - 17:47
their continued support of my
17:46 - 17:48
unsponsored content and if you're
17:47 - 17:49
interested in supporting my Channel
17:48 - 17:51
please check out the links down in the
17:49 - 17:53
description if you enjoyed this video
17:51 - 17:57
please consider subscribing and as
17:53 - 17:57
always thanks for watching the hookup
video to article