00:02 - 00:07

as the saying goes consistency builds

00:04 - 00:09

trust for decades the US has been a

00:07 - 00:11

global superpower but in just over 3

00:09 - 00:14

weeks president Donald Trump has

00:11 - 00:16

bewildered friends and Bamboozled foes

00:14 - 00:19

so how will his second term reshape the

00:16 - 00:22

role of the US on the world stage and

00:19 - 00:24

can the world still trust the US this is

00:22 - 00:28

Inside Story

00:24 - 00:28

[Music]

00:39 - 00:43

hello there I'm James Baye there's

00:40 - 00:45

growing International uncertainty about

00:43 - 00:48

what America stands for or what it's

00:45 - 00:50

committed to last week president Donald

00:48 - 00:53

Trump proposed the US take over Gaza and

00:50 - 00:56

forcibly relocate Palestinians he

00:53 - 00:58

announced tariffs on Mexico and Canada

00:56 - 01:01

within hours the levies were put on hold

00:58 - 01:03

for 30 days are still reeling from

01:01 - 01:05

Trump's first term when he withdrew the

01:03 - 01:07

us from the Iran nuclear deal a

01:05 - 01:09

carefully crafted agreement with world

01:07 - 01:12

powers to limit Tan's nuclear

01:09 - 01:14

development he also reversed President

01:12 - 01:17

Barack Obama's opening to Cuba left the

01:14 - 01:20

UN cultural agency UNESCO and pulled out

01:17 - 01:22

of the Paris agreement on climate change

01:20 - 01:24

now he has defense Alliance NATO on edge

01:22 - 01:27

hinting at a US withdrawal unless

01:24 - 01:29

members increase military spending

01:27 - 01:31

negotiating tactics or not Trump's

01:29 - 01:34

actions may have already caused

01:31 - 01:36

irreparable damage so how will countries

01:34 - 01:39

react and will his second presidency

01:36 - 01:42

speed up the emergence of a new world

01:39 - 01:47

order the United States will withdraw

01:42 - 01:49

from the Paris climate ACC Court drill

01:47 - 01:53

baby drill the first item that President

01:49 - 01:55

Trump is signing is the recision of 78

01:53 - 01:59

Biden era executive actions the word

01:55 - 02:01

tariff properly used is a beautiful word

01:59 - 02:02

we're thinking in terms of of 25% on

02:01 - 02:06

Mexico and Canada because they're

02:02 - 02:08

allowing vast numbers of people Canada's

02:06 - 02:10

very bad abuser also vast numbers of

02:08 - 02:13

people to come in and fentol to come in

02:10 - 02:15

well the European Union charges us 20%

02:13 - 02:17

plus plus plus and we are treated so

02:15 - 02:20

badly before I even arrive at the Oval

02:17 - 02:23

Office I will have the disastrous war

02:20 - 02:25

between Russia and Ukraine settled we're

02:23 - 02:27

protecting them you know they're not

02:25 - 02:28

protecting us so I don't think we should

02:27 - 02:30

be spending I'm not sure we should be

02:28 - 02:32

spending anything you going to used to

02:30 - 02:34

buy go we uh we're not going to buy

02:32 - 02:35

anything we're going to have it and

02:34 - 02:36

we're going to keep it and we're going

02:35 - 02:39

to make sure that there's going to be

02:36 - 02:42

peace Saturday at 12:00 if they're not

02:39 - 02:42

here all hell is going to break

02:45 - 02:49

out well let's meet today's panel who

02:47 - 02:51

are going to discuss all of this with us

02:49 - 02:53

in Dublin we have Scott Lucas who's

02:51 - 02:56

professor of us and international

02:53 - 02:58

politics at University College Dublin

02:56 - 03:00

from Doha we're joined by Ibrahim frat

02:58 - 03:02

an associate professor of conflict

03:00 - 03:04

resolution at the Doha Institute of

03:02 - 03:06

Graduate Studies and in Vienna Roger

03:04 - 03:08

Hilton a non-resident fellow at the

03:06 - 03:11

Canadian Global Affairs Institute and

03:08 - 03:13

the specialist on NATO and Euro Atlantic

03:11 - 03:17

security thank you all three of you for

03:13 - 03:19

joining us today on Inside Story it is

03:17 - 03:22

just over 3 weeks since Donald Trump was

03:19 - 03:26

inaugurated the 47th president of the US

03:22 - 03:28

Ibrahim such a whirlwind and Far Far

03:26 - 03:31

hose of um far-reaching decisions it

03:28 - 03:33

doesn't seem like 3 weeks

03:31 - 03:36

well yes this actually makes us Wonder

03:33 - 03:38

uh if this is all happening in 3 weeks

03:36 - 03:41

how is it going to look like for the

03:38 - 03:43

rest of the four years the second term

03:41 - 03:46

for Donald Trump in the in three weeks

03:43 - 03:50

he has declared a war on the entire

03:46 - 03:52

world uh from China to Canada to Europe

03:50 - 03:56

to the Middle East um he has lost his

03:52 - 04:00

trust among his even closest allies um

03:56 - 04:04

the European Union NATO um with his

04:00 - 04:07

neighbors Mexico and Canada um so and he

04:04 - 04:09

caused the disasters actually here in

04:07 - 04:15

the region in the Middle East where

04:09 - 04:18

after 15 months of a genocide that's uh

04:15 - 04:20

the world is watching live on TV for the

04:18 - 04:23

past 15 months instead of stopping the

04:20 - 04:26

genocide he has declared um a new

04:23 - 04:30

disaster actually of new displacement of

04:26 - 04:32

the Palestinians or u in Gaza

04:30 - 04:34

despite all the displacements that they

04:32 - 04:37

have been going through over the past

04:34 - 04:41

decades so uh it doesn't look like we're

04:37 - 04:44

going to go on a quiet for years with

04:41 - 04:47

Donald Trump and uh we should be I mean

04:44 - 04:50

we the word should be ready um and

04:47 - 04:53

prepared how to deal uh with someone

04:50 - 04:55

with such thinking um in the White House

04:53 - 04:57

and how to respond to him Scott it's

04:55 - 05:00

worth pointing out isn't it that all the

04:57 - 05:01

things he's done are actually executive

05:00 - 05:04

orders in other countries you'd call

05:01 - 05:07

them presidential decrees none of this

05:04 - 05:09

was legislation that went through

05:07 - 05:12

Congress now one of the reasons that the

05:09 - 05:15

US system of government is respected and

05:12 - 05:17

trusted around the world is the system

05:15 - 05:19

of checks and balances the uh three

05:17 - 05:21

co-equal branches of power what happened

05:19 - 05:25

to all of

05:21 - 05:27

that it's gone or at least the Trump

05:25 - 05:30

Administration including effectively an

05:27 - 05:33

unelected co-president Elon Musk

05:30 - 05:34

don't believe in checks and balances uh

05:33 - 05:36

we're going to be talking about Foreign

05:34 - 05:39

Affairs but this is in the context of an

05:36 - 05:44

attempt by Trump and mosque to tear down

05:39 - 05:46

the US system uh by trying to get

05:44 - 05:50

unauthorized access to records involving

05:46 - 05:52

trillions of dollars uh by using 19 to

05:50 - 05:55

26 year old men to do that by trying to

05:52 - 05:57

undermine and even destroy agencies such

05:55 - 06:00

as the US agency for International

05:57 - 06:02

Development uh by trying to fire Purge

06:00 - 06:04

thousands of employees including senior

06:02 - 06:06

staff including the heads of oversight

06:04 - 06:08

boards because this is an attempt and we

06:06 - 06:11

need to be honest here to move to an

06:08 - 06:13

autocracy and to get an autocracy you

06:11 - 06:16

have to try to bypass Congress or bend

06:13 - 06:18

it to your to its will which it succeed

06:16 - 06:20

in doing so far because the Republicans

06:18 - 06:23

who have the majority in both houses are

06:20 - 06:25

not opposing Trump and you have to

06:23 - 06:27

bypass the courts or say they're

06:25 - 06:29

illegitimate which we're on the verge of

06:27 - 06:32

talking about with JD Vance the vice

06:29 - 06:34

president saying just last weekend that

06:32 - 06:37

uh the court should not be able to make

06:34 - 06:40

legal rulings on Executive action the US

06:37 - 06:42

has always had a very strong executive

06:40 - 06:44

uh there's been a lot of Presidential

06:42 - 06:47

Power but up until now it has been

06:44 - 06:49

within a system in which there was a

06:47 - 06:51

collaboration uh between the three

06:49 - 06:53

branches of government we're in a new

06:51 - 06:56

era now we're talking about about at

06:53 - 06:59

home and abroad that Donald Trump and uh

06:56 - 07:01

Mr musk they function not for Alliance

06:59 - 07:04

they function not for America they

07:01 - 07:07

function not for checks and balances

07:04 - 07:09

they function for Donald Trump

07:07 - 07:12

alone Roger um inauguration day as

07:09 - 07:14

Ibrahim said only just over three weeks

07:12 - 07:16

ago I was there in DC given everything

07:14 - 07:19

that happens it seem an awfully long

07:16 - 07:22

time ago but we go back to that day one

07:19 - 07:24

of the first of many executive orders on

07:22 - 07:27

that day was pulling out of the Paris

07:24 - 07:30

climate deal for the second time Trump

07:27 - 07:34

did it back in 2017 so can the US do you

07:30 - 07:37

think in any way now be trusted by the

07:34 - 07:39

world with regard to The Climate crisis

07:37 - 07:40

arguably the most important issue for

07:39 - 07:42

the

07:40 - 07:44

planet uh thank you for the invite if

07:42 - 07:45

you don't mind before touching on

07:44 - 07:47

climate I just wanted to respond to what

07:45 - 07:49

one of my colleagues had mentioned in

07:47 - 07:51

Doha he started off his intervention by

07:49 - 07:53

saying that you know in the first three

07:51 - 07:55

weeks Donald Trump had irreversibly

07:53 - 07:58

damage the relations between allies

07:55 - 08:00

there's no doubt that there has been a

07:58 - 08:02

shock and there's a new d damic of

08:00 - 08:04

negotiations but 3 weeks in in my

08:02 - 08:07

opinion it's just too early to say so

08:04 - 08:10

bluntly that you know the relations are

08:07 - 08:12

irreversible yes there's been some very

08:10 - 08:13

um inappropriate and unfortunate

08:12 - 08:16

comments regarding let's say Greenland

08:13 - 08:17

or even myo country from from Canada but

08:16 - 08:19

I think it's important to realize that

08:17 - 08:22

these countries whether it's Denmark

08:19 - 08:23

Canada they are adapting and just last

08:22 - 08:25

week in a rare moment you had the

08:23 - 08:28

Japanese PM who is coming who is on good

08:25 - 08:30

relations so this is not a Walkin the

08:28 - 08:32

park with Donald Trump you have to earn

08:30 - 08:34

his trust obviously you have to bring

08:32 - 08:35

something to the table but I just think

08:34 - 08:38

at the beginning for our viewers things

08:35 - 08:40

maybe aren't as terrible got your point

08:38 - 08:43

but on on climate can the US now be

08:40 - 08:45

trusted on this issue at all well listen

08:43 - 08:47

no I mean I don't I think the the only

08:45 - 08:49

advantage of him coming back is that

08:47 - 08:51

this was not a big surprise uh I think

08:49 - 08:53

everybody expected it it gave the

08:51 - 08:56

International Community uh the time and

08:53 - 08:58

the opportunity to plan for it uh

08:56 - 09:00

unfortunately due to sort of the weak

08:58 - 09:01

economic situation of Europe I think the

09:00 - 09:03

real victims of this are going to be the

09:01 - 09:05

islands and all of the countries who are

09:03 - 09:08

most exposed to it but as I said climate

09:05 - 09:09

security uh and climate control climate

09:08 - 09:11

change in general was not one of his

09:09 - 09:12

priorities so I don't think people

09:11 - 09:14

should be shocked by this and just

09:12 - 09:15

because he's pulled out of this doesn't

09:14 - 09:17

mean it applies to other things like

09:15 - 09:21

Article Five for

09:17 - 09:23

NATO okay Ibrahim in terms of um us

09:21 - 09:25

International agreements and treaties

09:23 - 09:26

not just the climate deal there are so

09:25 - 09:29

many I mean he pulled out of the Iran

09:26 - 09:30

nuclear uh deal last time he was

09:29 - 09:32

President he pulled out of the

09:30 - 09:35

trans-pacific partnership now we've got

09:32 - 09:36

the threats against Panama there's a

09:35 - 09:40

treaty there there was a treaty that the

09:36 - 09:42

US signed originally in 1977 when Jimmy

09:40 - 09:44

Carter was President I mean does the

09:42 - 09:47

US's word stand for anything and does

09:44 - 09:50

that matter on other issues for example

09:47 - 09:53

the Abraham Accords which Trump wants to

09:50 - 09:55

expand well additionally to the all the

09:53 - 09:58

shocking things that Trump is doing

09:55 - 10:02

actually it's the colleague from Vienna

09:58 - 10:04

it's it's also shocking that he's still

10:02 - 10:06

considering you know what Trump is

10:04 - 10:10

planning to do or what Trump is is

10:06 - 10:13

saying he's openly clearly called for

10:10 - 10:18

for the annexation of Canada right a

10:13 - 10:21

neighbor and a NATO member right that

10:18 - 10:24

and and he tweeted on that right putting

10:21 - 10:27

the American flag on North America

10:24 - 10:30

clearly so this is something that's done

10:27 - 10:34

by Donald Trump himself not only this

10:30 - 10:38

but also the U this is we we have seen

10:34 - 10:40

four years of his term in the first year

10:38 - 10:44

in in the first term and we've seen what

10:40 - 10:46

he has done uh during that time and also

10:44 - 10:49

this is the second time withdrawing from

10:46 - 10:52

the climate agreement Paris climate

10:49 - 10:55

agreement so what additional evidence

10:52 - 10:59

that do we need to see that in order

10:55 - 11:02

to what he calls to earn the trust you

10:59 - 11:05

have someone who's calling for the

11:02 - 11:08

displacement uh of an entire population

11:05 - 11:11

in Gaza right under mining international

11:08 - 11:14

law we should all be cons extremely

11:11 - 11:15

concerned not only about what Trump's

11:14 - 11:19

saying but the implications for

11:15 - 11:21

international law

11:19 - 11:23

undermining undermining international

11:21 - 11:25

law whether it's in terms of withdrawing

11:23 - 11:28

from the climate change agreement or for

11:25 - 11:31

calling for continuing a genocide

11:28 - 11:34

basically another form of genocide and

11:31 - 11:38

here he's raising the threshold for what

11:34 - 11:40

the world Community is or can tolerate

11:38 - 11:44

in terms of what a trump is is coming

11:40 - 11:47

from a a superpower calling for a clear

11:44 - 11:49

displacement of an entire Community

11:47 - 11:51

Panama for example the Panama Canal but

11:49 - 11:53

more importantly perhaps because they're

11:51 - 11:55

NATO countries uh Greenland which is

11:53 - 11:57

part of the Kingdom of Denmark and

11:55 - 12:00

Canada which he as we we we heard there

11:57 - 12:03

he wants to make the 50 first state he

12:00 - 12:05

says I mean these are close friends of

12:03 - 12:08

the United States that's the bit that

12:05 - 12:10

seems most shocking to me I mean even if

12:08 - 12:12

he doesn't follow through on some of

12:10 - 12:16

these things what do you think it sets

12:12 - 12:18

as a precedent given the backdrop of the

12:16 - 12:21

invasion of Ukraine given the fact that

12:18 - 12:24

we know China thinks that Taw Taiwan

12:21 - 12:27

belongs to China well I I think that's

12:24 - 12:29

an interesting contrast between Ibrahim

12:27 - 12:31

and Roger and and how they see

12:29 - 12:33

Trump uh you know ibrahim's point of

12:31 - 12:35

view is is that you you just can't deal

12:33 - 12:37

with Trump that there's no way to engage

12:35 - 12:39

with it whereas if I understand Rogers

12:37 - 12:42

correctly he's saying look you can still

12:39 - 12:44

engage with Trump uh on specific issues

12:42 - 12:47

like the Japanese have tried to do I

12:44 - 12:49

mean my point of view here is is that

12:47 - 12:51

you can engage with Trump but you can

12:49 - 12:52

engage with him as a transactional

12:51 - 12:54

president in other words you have to

12:52 - 12:56

give Trump something which is not

12:54 - 12:59

something for America it's something

12:56 - 13:02

that makes Donald Trump look good and

12:59 - 13:04

that may not match up to American

13:02 - 13:06

interest it certainly doesn't match up

13:04 - 13:08

to multilateral interest I think that's

13:06 - 13:11

the starting point the Trump folks don't

13:08 - 13:12

think in terms of multilateralism as

13:11 - 13:15

Marco Rubio the new secretary of state

13:12 - 13:18

said the post-war International order is

13:15 - 13:20

Obsolete and that means former allies

13:18 - 13:22

have to recalibrate the European Union

13:20 - 13:25

has to recalibrate Gulf States have to

13:22 - 13:27

recalibrate Japan has to recalibrate how

13:25 - 13:29

they make these approaches my worry here

13:27 - 13:31

beyond all of this is and this is what's

13:29 - 13:34

different about Trump

13:31 - 13:37

2.0 is that Trump is damaging the US

13:34 - 13:41

institutions that you deal with so for

13:37 - 13:43

example there is a ban on climate change

13:41 - 13:46

you cannot mention it if you're a US

13:43 - 13:47

agency now us scientists are barred from

13:46 - 13:50

collaborating with International

13:47 - 13:53

colleagues not only on environmental

13:50 - 13:56

issues but on health issues the state

13:53 - 13:59

department the FBI intelligence agencies

13:56 - 14:01

are effectively being told you are

13:59 - 14:04

paralyzed and cannot act until you prove

14:01 - 14:05

you're loyal to Donald Trump that's the

14:04 - 14:08

worry here whether we talk about dealing

14:05 - 14:10

with allies or with adversaries the US

14:08 - 14:13

system itself may not be able to

14:10 - 14:14

function effectively on any of these key

14:13 - 14:18

issues that we're going to talk about

14:14 - 14:20

today Roger as an expert but also as a

14:18 - 14:22

Canadian because Canada has been in the

14:20 - 14:24

firing line in the last couple of weeks

14:22 - 14:27

what do you think about the way this is

14:24 - 14:29

being done the way Donald Trump does

14:27 - 14:32

this because there's no quart

14:29 - 14:36

negotiation or quart diplomacy it's all

14:32 - 14:39

done very very publicly very impulsively

14:36 - 14:41

very aggressively that's not the way

14:39 - 14:43

allies normally talk to each other I

14:41 - 14:45

mean if I'm being quite honest with you

14:43 - 14:46

I don't think I felt much worse in my

14:45 - 14:48

life than hearing some of the comments

14:46 - 14:50

coming from the president Canada has

14:48 - 14:53

gone to war with the United States we

14:50 - 14:55

have the longest uh undefended border

14:53 - 14:57

there's so much uh you know not just the

14:55 - 14:59

trade but the cultural relations so of

14:57 - 15:01

course I mean Elon Musk coming on in

14:59 - 15:03

referring to the Prime Minister as just

15:01 - 15:05

a governor of the 51st state is quite

15:03 - 15:07

frankly Beyond despicable but again

15:05 - 15:10

going back to what Scott said and and my

15:07 - 15:12

colleague in Doha I mean obviously look

15:10 - 15:13

nobody wants to hear this and as the PM

15:12 - 15:16

said you know we don't want this trade

15:13 - 15:18

War but you know we have huge things at

15:16 - 15:20

stake financially and of course the

15:18 - 15:22

Canadian government and Ottawa has moved

15:20 - 15:24

Heaven and Hell uh you know to try to

15:22 - 15:25

avoid this trade War uh of course

15:24 - 15:28

they've accelerated a lot of things that

15:25 - 15:29

have already been agreed to but this is

15:28 - 15:31

no way to really talk to allies but

15:29 - 15:34

unfortunately this is the reality we are

15:31 - 15:35

in and it takes uh you know a new

15:34 - 15:37

Dynamic and a new language to

15:35 - 15:38

communicate and behind the scenes at

15:37 - 15:41

least speaking from the Canadian

15:38 - 15:43

perspective while nonperfect things are

15:41 - 15:44

still going on fairly well between uh

15:43 - 15:46

Secretary of State of Rubio and foreign

15:44 - 15:48

minister Jolie same thing with the

15:46 - 15:51

National Security adviser so whether

15:48 - 15:53

it's Panama Canada Japan Denmark whoever

15:51 - 15:55

the next country is we all have to adapt

15:53 - 15:57

to the new situation and as you see with

15:55 - 15:59

Europe I mean they've also put forward a

15:57 - 16:01

whole host of options about Trump to

15:59 - 16:04

avoid the trade War whether it's buying

16:01 - 16:07

more LNG buying more American Arms um to

16:04 - 16:08

sort of push this off but I mean this is

16:07 - 16:09

the world we're in right now and it's

16:08 - 16:12

adapt or

16:09 - 16:15

die I mean Ibrahim there may be many

16:12 - 16:17

people around the world who never fully

16:15 - 16:18

trusted the US it's like any other

16:17 - 16:21

country it has its own national

16:18 - 16:23

interests but they perhaps at least knew

16:21 - 16:26

where they thought the US stood they

16:23 - 16:28

trusted where the US stood on issues and

16:26 - 16:30

one of the things it used to stand for

16:28 - 16:32

was help for the poor and needy around

16:30 - 16:36

the world and now we've seen what's

16:32 - 16:38

happened to us a I mean how concerned

16:36 - 16:40

are you about that

16:38 - 16:43

development thank you well let me link

16:40 - 16:45

this actually to what my colleagues have

16:43 - 16:47

said and I'm I'm not against engagement

16:45 - 16:49

I'm a conflict resolution professor and

16:47 - 16:53

I spent my entire life my career

16:49 - 16:55

actually advocating for engagement but

16:53 - 16:58

we should be clear about what we what we

16:55 - 17:01

what things we can engage with yes we

16:58 - 17:03

can engage on interest of how we can

17:01 - 17:06

maximize our own interest and how we we

17:03 - 17:10

can negotiate it but my friends we

17:06 - 17:13

cannot we cannot engage or

17:10 - 17:15

negotiate right with Donald Trump on

17:13 - 17:19

issues that are related to international

17:15 - 17:22

law not on values on values of a human

17:19 - 17:24

society not on sovereignty of a

17:22 - 17:27

neighboring country that's calling for

17:24 - 17:30

annexation of a neighboring country I

17:27 - 17:33

cannot engage with a president a

17:30 - 17:36

superpower president on values of

17:33 - 17:40

negotiating with him whether to displace

17:36 - 17:42

a whole Community Force displacement and

17:40 - 17:45

continuation of genocide there is no

17:42 - 17:48

engagement on this ground sovereignty

17:45 - 17:50

human values there is no engagement on

17:48 - 17:53

these levels there is a confrontation on

17:50 - 17:55

them and that's the difference where

17:53 - 17:58

between my colleagues and I engagement

17:55 - 18:00

can happen on maximization of interest

17:58 - 18:03

and back to your question on

18:00 - 18:07

humanitarian intervention you know us

18:03 - 18:09

Aid right there will be millions and

18:07 - 18:11

millions of people will be affected as a

18:09 - 18:16

result of the war that he declared on

18:11 - 18:19

USA uh that has been serving poor people

18:16 - 18:21

hospitals uh school education in many

18:19 - 18:25

marginalized communities around the

18:21 - 18:29

world that they're going to be affected

18:25 - 18:32

as a result of the Mask Trump attack for

18:29 - 18:34

declaring on on USA those those

18:32 - 18:36

communities are going to suffer

18:34 - 18:39

immensely and they're going to

18:36 - 18:41

experience disasters I cannot engage on

18:39 - 18:44

these values and that's where Donald

18:41 - 18:47

Trump should be confronted not engaged

18:44 - 18:52

with um not only this in the first term

18:47 - 18:55

he cut the U the total funding on onra

18:52 - 18:58

that's supporting about 7 million

18:55 - 19:00

Palestinian refugees total cut that he

18:58 - 19:02

that he made with that they were

19:00 - 19:06

affected as a result of this now he is

19:02 - 19:09

pushing for again the shutdown of anra

19:06 - 19:11

where is that supporting that that's B

19:09 - 19:13

the most needed at this time during the

19:11 - 19:15

genocide that's happening in Gaza how

19:13 - 19:18

can we engage on

19:15 - 19:20

this let me let me just move it on if

19:18 - 19:23

you don't mind Ibrahim and bringing SC

19:20 - 19:25

if you canow me just one final Point

19:23 - 19:28

quickly very quickly with with the

19:25 - 19:31

humanitarian um Dimensions it's not only

19:28 - 19:33

going to be these communities affected

19:31 - 19:35

it's the US national interest that is

19:33 - 19:38

going to be affected and Mark robu knows

19:35 - 19:40

this very well go back to his speeches

19:38 - 19:44

in the in the Congress that he was one

19:40 - 19:46

of the strongest advocates for securing

19:44 - 19:51

National interest American National

19:46 - 19:51

interest through us a and

19:51 - 19:56

nowk

19:53 - 19:58

for Scott bringing you in now we're less

19:56 - 20:01

than two weeks away from what is the

19:58 - 20:03

third anniversary of Russia's invasion

20:01 - 20:05

of Ukraine let me read you I've got so

20:03 - 20:07

many of these quotes I could have read

20:05 - 20:09

you but the the um NATO Secretary

20:07 - 20:12

General Yen stoltenberg this is from

20:09 - 20:14

2022 we are prepared for the L haul

20:12 - 20:17

we'll support them for as long as it

20:14 - 20:20

takes now given that that sounds very

20:17 - 20:23

Hollow now um given where we are I mean

20:20 - 20:26

do you think Ukraine can trust the us or

20:23 - 20:29

NATO for that

20:26 - 20:31

matter um certainly Ukraine cannot trust

20:29 - 20:33

the Trump Administration and certainly

20:31 - 20:35

the starting point and I agree with

20:33 - 20:38

Ibraham on this is is that you know you

20:35 - 20:40

cannot engage with Donald Trump when it

20:38 - 20:42

comes to for example ethnic cleansing of

20:40 - 20:44

Gaza that's

20:42 - 20:47

unacceptable and the question regarding

20:44 - 20:49

Ukraine and Russia is can you engage

20:47 - 20:50

with the Trump Administration to ensure

20:49 - 20:54

continued

20:50 - 20:56

support of Ukraine against that Invasion

20:54 - 20:59

which is going to be entering its fourth

20:56 - 21:00

term fairly soon here we have a bit of a

20:59 - 21:04

complexity where you can't necessarily

21:00 - 21:06

go on a yes no issue and that is first

21:04 - 21:08

of all Donald Trump himself doesn't have

21:06 - 21:10

much knowledge of Ukraine and Russia so

21:08 - 21:13

the question is what form would that

21:10 - 21:15

negotiation take the starting point for

21:13 - 21:18

that probably is is that Ukraine will

21:15 - 21:21

accept a Russian occupation of parts of

21:18 - 21:24

Ukraine in the short term in return for

21:21 - 21:26

security guarantees whether that's an

21:24 - 21:28

actual invitation to join NATO or a

21:26 - 21:31

guarantee of support from NATO members

21:28 - 21:33

with continued Aid now there are certain

21:31 - 21:35

members of the Trump

21:33 - 21:38

Administration who have indicated they

21:35 - 21:41

may be open to this that includes the uh

21:38 - 21:44

Envoy for Ukraine Keith Kellogg it

21:41 - 21:45

includes the National Security adviser

21:44 - 21:48

Mike

21:45 - 21:50

Waltz the problem here is is will they

21:48 - 21:53

be the adults in the room who will be

21:50 - 21:57

listened to or Will trump in terms of

21:53 - 21:59

being very impetuous decide look on his

21:57 - 22:01

own accord or through someone like his

21:59 - 22:03

personal friend with Steve witkoff we're

22:01 - 22:05

going to negotiate directly with the

22:03 - 22:07

Russians there are indications that

22:05 - 22:09

Trump is actually moving towards that

22:07 - 22:11

point of view I think we'll see at the

22:09 - 22:13

Munich security conference this weekend

22:11 - 22:16

where Vladimir zalinski will meet us

22:13 - 22:17

officials for the first time vice

22:16 - 22:20

president Vance treasury secretary

22:17 - 22:22

bezant whether or not you can trust not

22:20 - 22:23

trust the United States whether or not

22:22 - 22:26

the Trump Administration can be part of

22:23 - 22:28

the conversation for the longtime

22:26 - 22:29

security of Ukraine or whether Ukraine

22:28 - 22:32

and the rest to the International

22:29 - 22:34

Community has to step up to give Ukraine

22:32 - 22:37

those assurances while the United States

22:34 - 22:38

may put itself on the sidelines or even

22:37 - 22:40

on the side of Vladimir Putin yeah I

22:38 - 22:41

Scott I think Munich will be important

22:40 - 22:46

and I'm going to be there covering it

22:41 - 22:49

for Al jazer um Roger um NATO 75 years

22:46 - 22:52

old last year they gather again for

22:49 - 22:54

their Summit in June Donald Trump will

22:52 - 22:57

be there give us an idea not just on

22:54 - 23:00

Ukraine but how do you think NATO allies

22:57 - 23:02

are going to to be feeling right now

23:00 - 23:04

pretty uneasy I would

23:02 - 23:07

think yeah James if I just may comment

23:04 - 23:09

back on on what Scott said I mean uh

23:07 - 23:11

obviously the way Kev and the zalinsky

23:09 - 23:12

administration is dealing with it I mean

23:11 - 23:15

I think they've actually stepped up to

23:12 - 23:17

the plate quite well they understand the

23:15 - 23:18

audience uh and correct me if I'm wrong

23:17 - 23:21

Scott I mean I think you have treasury

23:18 - 23:23

secretary Binet now in Kiev looking uh

23:21 - 23:25

at sort of the rare earth minerals and

23:23 - 23:27

whatnot so again just for the viewers I

23:25 - 23:30

mean it's not an optimal situation but

23:27 - 23:31

Kiev has adapted to the situation they

23:30 - 23:33

know that this is sort of a legacy issue

23:31 - 23:36

for Trump about getting peace so again

23:33 - 23:38

whether it's the rare earth

23:36 - 23:40

minerals sorry the rare Earths for

23:38 - 23:42

example I mean the US used to do things

23:40 - 23:44

because it believed in freedom and

23:42 - 23:47

democracy not for for transactional

23:44 - 23:48

reasons didn't it I I agree but I mean

23:47 - 23:51

at the moment the number one priority

23:48 - 23:53

for Kev right now is survival and making

23:51 - 23:55

sure that the the line doesn't collapse

23:53 - 23:57

any faster that it's going now again

23:55 - 23:59

it's it's not in things would have been

23:57 - 24:00

much different if Vice president Harris

23:59 - 24:02

had won it but this is the reality of

24:00 - 24:05

the situation and they're evolving as

24:02 - 24:07

things go we can talk on another episode

24:05 - 24:09

about values and whatnot but as I said I

24:07 - 24:11

mean Russia now there was the prisoner

24:09 - 24:13

exchange yesterday and as you see from

24:11 - 24:15

the tweets also James I mean it's you

24:13 - 24:17

know Trump has said massive sanctions to

24:15 - 24:18

come unless Russia comes to the table

24:17 - 24:21

Russia doesn't seem inclined to want to

24:18 - 24:22

negotiate right now at the moment so the

24:21 - 24:25

way the Optics are looking at least it

24:22 - 24:28

might be better for Kiev when it comes

24:25 - 24:31

to Nato I mean 75 years there's been all

24:28 - 24:35

types of flavors uh of issues 1974 with

24:31 - 24:36

turkey and Cyprus you had the Iraq War

24:35 - 24:38

uh again I think just like my earlier

24:36 - 24:39

comment about the Paris climate Accord I

24:38 - 24:41

mean I think people and the Brain Trust

24:39 - 24:43

within NATO have thought about this for

24:41 - 24:46

a while there's a lot of backup plans uh

24:43 - 24:47

you have Secretary General Ruta uh you

24:46 - 24:49

know who I think is quite good at

24:47 - 24:52

dealing with Trump and even if you go

24:49 - 24:53

back to the 2018 NATO Summit in Brussels

24:52 - 24:55

where you know that was the one where

24:53 - 24:58

Trump in the room was talking about

24:55 - 24:59

leaving rout was the one who convinced

24:58 - 25:02

them about taking all the credit for the

24:59 - 25:04

spending um you have 24 of the 32 allies

25:02 - 25:07

where spending is up and I think moving

25:04 - 25:09

towards hey obviously the atmosphere is

25:07 - 25:11

not necessarily maybe so jovial but it

25:09 - 25:13

is the wakeup call that NATO allies

25:11 - 25:16

including my country need to do about

25:13 - 25:18

spending more Trump is looking at a 5%

25:16 - 25:20

Target where if I read correctly this

25:18 - 25:23

morning Poland is going to come in at

25:20 - 25:25

4.7% this year um and anything north of

25:23 - 25:27

3% and tactically speaking all of the

25:25 - 25:30

sabotage asymmetrical Warfare that we've

25:27 - 25:32

seen in the north you've had NATO really

25:30 - 25:34

step up with the Baltic Sentry Force now

25:32 - 25:36

there's the EU is getting more involved

25:34 - 25:39

about taking down the ghost fleets which

25:36 - 25:41

80% of Russia's crude is exiting on so

25:39 - 25:43

again this is another example of NATO

25:41 - 25:45

adapting and more importantly another

25:43 - 25:48

clear sign about why they need to spend

25:45 - 25:50

more whether it's to appease Trump to

25:48 - 25:52

push off the threat uh of trump with the

25:50 - 25:54

Danish intelligence service saying that

25:52 - 25:56

in the next 5 years they could talk and

25:54 - 25:58

last one I mean Europe's competitiveness

25:56 - 26:01

Innovation this is long overdue l in the

25:58 - 26:03

Leta and draggy reports so maybe the

26:01 - 26:04

shock that Europe needs to get their act

26:03 - 26:07

together when it comes to defense

26:04 - 26:09

spending Scott very briefly at the end I

26:07 - 26:12

mean we've still got most of the

26:09 - 26:14

four-year term of trump to come but do

26:12 - 26:16

you think some of the things that have

26:14 - 26:19

happened already are going to change

26:16 - 26:22

things for good can the world return to

26:19 - 26:25

business as usual after

26:22 - 26:27

Trump not at the moment because while

26:25 - 26:30

there may be the ability to deal with

26:27 - 26:32

Trump even to maneuver with Trump on

26:30 - 26:34

individual issues uh you know we've

26:32 - 26:37

talked about tariffs for example we've

26:34 - 26:39

talked about Ukraine for example uh on

26:37 - 26:41

other issues there is not room to

26:39 - 26:44

maneuver with Trump right now Israel

26:41 - 26:47

Gaza is one of them but more importantly

26:44 - 26:48

is the context of that Beyond Trump you

26:47 - 26:51

have to talk about what is the state of

26:48 - 26:54

the US system and here we need to be

26:51 - 26:56

open and clear what is being carried out

26:54 - 26:57

right now in the most serious threat to

26:56 - 27:01

the United States in peace time since

26:57 - 27:04

186 65 is an attempt by Donald Trump and

27:01 - 27:07

his allies including people like Steven

27:04 - 27:11

Miller including people like Elon Musk

27:07 - 27:14

to break the US system entire agencies

27:11 - 27:16

like usaid suddenly swept aside the

27:14 - 27:19

records of other agencies from the

27:16 - 27:21

treasury being stolen even the records

27:19 - 27:23

of the Pentagon being at risk the

27:21 - 27:25

prospect of the head of American

27:23 - 27:28

National Intelligence being someone who

27:25 - 27:30

has been sympathetic to people Bashar

27:28 - 27:32

al-assad in Syria Vladimir Putin in

27:30 - 27:34

Russia you can choose Donald Trump or

27:32 - 27:38

you can choose the US system in the long

27:34 - 27:39

term you cannot choose both that will be

27:38 - 27:42

an issue first and foremost for

27:39 - 27:44

Americans but it will be one that the

27:42 - 27:46

world will have to reckon with and not

27:44 - 27:48

only the next few weeks but the months

27:46 - 27:50

and years to come thank you very much

27:48 - 27:53

gentlemen thank you for joining us today

27:50 - 27:54

Scott Lucas Ibrahim frad and Roger

27:53 - 27:56

Hilton if you didn't catch all of our

27:54 - 27:58

discussion don't worry you can watch

27:56 - 28:01

this and any of our programs again

27:58 - 28:03

whenever you want on our website al.com

28:01 - 28:04

if you have ideas for future topics we

28:03 - 28:06

should discuss on this program please

28:04 - 28:10

share them with us on Facebook

28:06 - 28:12

facebook.com AJ insidestory or message

28:10 - 28:14

us on X where our handle is AJ

28:12 - 28:17

insidestory from the insid story team

28:14 - 28:21

and me James Baye please stay safe and

28:17 - 28:21

well bye-bye for now

28:25 - 28:28

[Music]

28:31 - 28:37

make sure to subscribe to our channel to

28:33 - 28:37

get the latest news from Al jazer

Consistency and Trust: Analyzing the Impact of President Donald Trump's Actions on the World Stage

In a world where trust is built on consistency, the whirlwind of decisions made by President Donald Trump in just over three weeks has left friends bewildered and foes bamboozled. As the second term of his presidency looms, there is growing international uncertainty about America's stance and commitment to global affairs. How will these actions reshape the role of the US on the world stage, and can the world still trust the US?

International Uncertainty and Trump's Actions

President Trump's propositions and decisions have sent shockwaves globally. From proposing the US takeover of Gaza to tariffs on Mexico and Canada, his actions have already caused significant disruptions and raised questions about America's reliability as a global partner. The withdrawal from international agreements like the Iran nuclear deal and the Paris climate agreement has further strained trust in the US.

Challenges to the US System of Governance

The Trump administration's approach, characterized by executive orders over legislative procedures, raises concerns about the erosion of the US system of checks and balances. The disregard for established norms and the wielding of presidential power without collaboration from other branches of government put the US on a precarious path towards potential autocracy.

Trust and Engagement with Allies and Adversaries

While some believe in engaging with President Trump on a transactional level, others find it challenging to reconcile values and international law violations. The implications of Trump's actions, including calls for annexation and displacement, raise questions about the US's credibility. Engaging with Trump on issues like the humanitarian aid and international law violations becomes increasingly complex.

NATO and Security Concerns

NATO allies find themselves in a delicate position, seeking to balance their commitments while adapting to Trump's unconventional diplomatic style. Trump's views on defense spending and alliances present challenges for NATO members, who must navigate a changing geopolitical landscape with a heightened emphasis on security and defense.

The Future Under Trump 2.0

With Trump's second term underway, the world faces a critical juncture in international relations. The lasting impact of Trump's actions on the US system and its role in global affairs remains uncertain. As the Munich Security Conference approaches, key players like Ukraine and NATO must navigate the complexities of engaging with the Trump administration while safeguarding their national interests.

In conclusion, the world watches as America's role on the world stage evolves under President Trump's leadership. The questions about trust, engagement, and the future of international relations linger, shaping the global geopolitical landscape for years to come. Trust, once built on consistency, now faces unprecedented challenges in an era defined by uncertainty and rapid change.

EndFragment